See The Attach Example

See The Attach Example See The Attach â€" Essay Example > Introduction The Global socio-political matters never cease to mesmerize any interested character, since the times of civilization arrived to the epoch of colonization up to the time of independence. The cold war era then followed whereby the Soviets were gradually but firmly outmaneuvered by the more resourceful capitalist of the time. The aftermath of the cold war epoch resulted to the growing influence of what some individuals of our generation refer to as quasi- governments (for example the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)). The World Bank and the IMF subsequently took the responsibility of the global economic police information especially the poorer states how they are suppose to spend their funds. So as to get more monetary assistance, these Bretton Woods institutions ordered that nations open up their markets for liberalization within the “Structural Adjustment Programs” that motivated state governments to finance privatization initiatives, ahead of public and welfare services (Hagwati 2009). Parallel to this was the impact of multinational organizations such as the United Nations (UN) also majorly structuring the global issues. Towards the new millennium matters took a divergent route. Out of nowhere, we were being feed with the rhetoric known as globalization, which is an umbrella idiom for sophisticated series of social, political, economic and technological transformations viewed as enhancing interaction and interdependence between companies and people in unfortunate locations. Within the fields of political economy and economics it generally implies to the growing integrations of economies all over the world, and more specifically in terms of financial flows and trade. The term in certain cases also refers to the movement of knowledge (technology) and people (labor) across the globe. Within its most basic principles, nothing is mysterious concerning globalization. But at the moment certain individuals are arguing that gl obalization has majorly advantaged the already well-established world economies and has offered them leverage not just to trade with the entire world but also affect their general politics and lifestyles (Weatherford 2010). Some have said that USA is deploying globalization as a mechanism of “corporate imperialism”, the one which crushes the human rights of the growing communities and purports to bring forth prosperity, yet frequently simply results to profiteering and plundering. The other depressing impact of globalization has been the cultural imperialism through cultural assimilation. This may be further illustrated by a scenario of exportation of the artificial needs or wants and the inhibition or destruction of indigenous local cultures. This then, lands me on the essence of my submission. When viewed critically, globalization is gradually moving toward Americanization. For the purposes of clarity, at the start of 1900, the term referred to captivating new immigrants and transforming then to Americans… regardless whether they wanted to maintain their customary ways or not. This system often entailed adjusting to American customs, dress and culture and learning English (Hopskins 2009). Critics affirm their concerns that globalization is nothing short of imposition of the cultures of the Americans on the whole world. To be precise, the most evident symbol of globalization appears to be the spread of cola (Coca Cola products and Pepsi) and hamburgers to almost every nation on earth.